Hudghton (Greens/EFA) - Mr President, the purpose of the European Fisheries Fund should be to implement the common fisheries policy, according to Mr Borg. In Scotland, though, a more accurate description of the need would be to compensate for the disastrous effects of the common fisheries policy on our communities and it is a worry that the total fund projected is about the same for 25 as we have had for 15 Member States. I support most of the amendments from the Committee on Fisheries of this Parliament, with the exception of vessel construction. In particular I support changing the presumption from fleet reduction to adaptation, so that account can be taken of individual circumstances in areas. I support highlighting the importance of aquaculture, priority for small-scale inshore fisheries and the compensation proposed for enforced tie-up. I welcome the fact that the Commission considers fisheries important enough for its Fisheries Commissioner to be here for this debate. It is a pity that the Presidency did not do likewise, but then that is all too typical of UK governments and how they see fisheries, particularly in Scotland.

Twitter YouTube Join the SNP
 

Twitter Latest

hudghtonmepSNP RT @AlynSmithMEP: TeamSNP at our posts, votes getting underway in Brussels before back home for #GE17 #VoteSNP campaigning. https://t.co/Jm…
hudghtonmepSNP RT @AngusRobertson: Two biggest food and drink exports from UK are Scottish, underlining importance of Single European Market. #VoteSNP ht…
hudghtonmepSNP RT @la_lams: This @theSNP manifesto has fairness, opportunity and democracy at its heart. Read it here 👉 https://t.co/VTdktPDkTp 📒 #VoteSNP…

Get in touch

Joomla forms builder by JoomlaShine