Hudghton (Greens/EFA) - Mr President, the purpose of the European Fisheries Fund should be to implement the common fisheries policy, according to Mr Borg. In Scotland, though, a more accurate description of the need would be to compensate for the disastrous effects of the common fisheries policy on our communities and it is a worry that the total fund projected is about the same for 25 as we have had for 15 Member States. I support most of the amendments from the Committee on Fisheries of this Parliament, with the exception of vessel construction. In particular I support changing the presumption from fleet reduction to adaptation, so that account can be taken of individual circumstances in areas. I support highlighting the importance of aquaculture, priority for small-scale inshore fisheries and the compensation proposed for enforced tie-up. I welcome the fact that the Commission considers fisheries important enough for its Fisheries Commissioner to be here for this debate. It is a pity that the Presidency did not do likewise, but then that is all too typical of UK governments and how they see fisheries, particularly in Scotland.

Twitter YouTube Join the SNP
 

Twitter Latest

hudghtonmepSNP RT @NicolaSturgeon: Off to London to meet with @IanBlackfordMP and @theSNP MPs ahead of no confidence vote in Commons later. We want UK to…
hudghtonmepSNP RT @NicolaSturgeon: Spoke to PM earlier - not obvious that she has any real idea what to do next. Also not at all clear she is open to any…
hudghtonmepSNP RT @BBCScotlandNews: “It’s time to put this back to the people in another referendum” First Minister Nicola Sturgeon reacts to Theresa May’…

Get in touch

Joomla forms builder by JoomlaShine